Skip to main content

No13. When Scientists "CHEAT" - TRUE?

In real fact, the much-touted experiments about the origin of life tell us very little about where real, functional proteins came from. However this is very rarely mentioned when Scientists blare out their fake headlines saying they have succeeded to create the building blocks of life.

 If scientists wanted us to really believe them, they would want to duplicate what might have happened in the primordial soup billions of years ago. They would simply mix up some chemicals in a vat, expose them to some energy source and see what happens. yet they never just do this. Why not? They would never get any chemical compounds that way. They have to have controlled experiments???????
1. Chemicals in nature are never found in just their pure form. They can never predict what reaction will take place.
How do scientists avoid complicated competing reactions. They only use isolated pure ingredients. They use new pure ingredients at each step.
2. They rig their experiments by screening out destructive wavelengths of ultraviolet light. They only want a controlled environment.
3. They use traps  that remove their amino acids from the reaction as soon as they form to protect them from disintegrating. They trap the amino acids in water.The delicate new compounds must be protected.
Image result for Picture of Miller's Experiment
1958 Experiment   - Science.




NATURE DOES NOT COME EQUIPPED WITH HANDY TRAPS TO PROTECT THE DELICATE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE.

 All these so-called famous experiments are just artificial manipulation trying to coax these chemical down 'chemical pathways' which never happens in the natural conditions on earth.

So what does all this prove: "That Life can only be created by an intelligent agent directing, controlling and guiding the process."
The latest Experiments just prove what Biblical faith says, "that an Intelligent agent was the Creator of all life on this Planet.
How now shall we then Live? Charles Colson p. 71-73

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No 26. Salvation through Sex

National Women's Hall of Fame Mary Steichen Calderone Mary Calderone sees the problem with the world is the human nature is not evolving as quickly as technology; therefore we must remould human nature itself to the modern, every changing world. She says that a new change is breaking across the Horizon and the task of Educators is to prepare children to step into this new world. To do this they must pry children away from old views and values especially from Biblical and other traditional forms of sexual morality for "religious laws and rules about sex were made on the basis of ignorance.  " Family Book about Sexuality" Calderone and Johnston p. 171 Notes from Colson and Pearcey p.242 When we trace the history of ideas about sexuality, it becomes clear that the founders of sex education never did seek simply to transmit a collection of facts about how our bodies work. Rather, they were evangelists for the utopian worldview, a religion , in which a "sci...

No.23. Einstein and the Clergymen

"A God who did not abolish suffering - worse, a God who abolished sin precisely by suffering - is a scandal to the modern mind. "  Peter Kreeft. C. Colson and N. Pearcey p.203 ranker.com He ate grasshoppers just to troll his friends The year was 1942, and the scene was the crowded front parlour  of Albert Einstein's home, where the famous physicist had arranged a tea party for three clergymen: a young orthodox rabbi named Dov Hertzen, a middle-aged Catholic Priest named Brian McNaughton and a liberal Protestant Theologian named Mark Hartman. Albert Einstein's Out of my Latter years and  The World as I see it. "Rabbi Hertzen here 'provoked' this little party," Einstein began, as soon as the men had sampled the tea and cookies. " He congratulated me on my open-mindedness when I dropped my belief in a static Universe. Not long ago, I observed Hubble's red-shifts for myself at Cal Tech." Einstein leaned back in his chair and ...

no.5 Christianity and Multiculturalism

As a consequence of Moral Relativism  , the naturalist treats all cultures as morally equivalent, each only reflecting its own history and experience. India is Hindu and Thailand is Buddhist etc. Contemporary tends like Postmodernism and multiculturalism are rooted firmly in naturalism, for if there is no transcendent source of truth or morality, then we find our identity only in our race, or tribe or gender or Ethnic Group. One outstanding African Leader said that the Western Press and Media are only enforcing African Tribalism. But Christians can never equate truth with the limited perspective of some small group. TRUTH is God's Perspective as revealed in Scripture.. Jesus said in John 14:6 " I am the Way, the Truth and the Life". Notice the definite article before each making each unique. THE Way, THE Truth, and THE life. Hence, while we appreciate the cultural diversity, we insist on the propriety of judging particular cultural practices as morally wrong or rig...