Skip to main content

No13. When Scientists "CHEAT" - TRUE?

In real fact, the much-touted experiments about the origin of life tell us very little about where real, functional proteins came from. However this is very rarely mentioned when Scientists blare out their fake headlines saying they have succeeded to create the building blocks of life.

 If scientists wanted us to really believe them, they would want to duplicate what might have happened in the primordial soup billions of years ago. They would simply mix up some chemicals in a vat, expose them to some energy source and see what happens. yet they never just do this. Why not? They would never get any chemical compounds that way. They have to have controlled experiments???????
1. Chemicals in nature are never found in just their pure form. They can never predict what reaction will take place.
How do scientists avoid complicated competing reactions. They only use isolated pure ingredients. They use new pure ingredients at each step.
2. They rig their experiments by screening out destructive wavelengths of ultraviolet light. They only want a controlled environment.
3. They use traps  that remove their amino acids from the reaction as soon as they form to protect them from disintegrating. They trap the amino acids in water.The delicate new compounds must be protected.
Image result for Picture of Miller's Experiment
1958 Experiment   - Science.




NATURE DOES NOT COME EQUIPPED WITH HANDY TRAPS TO PROTECT THE DELICATE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE.

 All these so-called famous experiments are just artificial manipulation trying to coax these chemical down 'chemical pathways' which never happens in the natural conditions on earth.

So what does all this prove: "That Life can only be created by an intelligent agent directing, controlling and guiding the process."
The latest Experiments just prove what Biblical faith says, "that an Intelligent agent was the Creator of all life on this Planet.
How now shall we then Live? Charles Colson p. 71-73

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No.9. How did the whole Universe Begin?

Notes from Colson p.57 -67 Scientists  have completely reversed their theories in the past few decades. They thought for ages that the Physical Universe was eternal and therefore needs no 'creator'. Now they postulate that the universe did have an ultimate origin and that it began at a finite time in the past - just as the Bible teaches. Many ancient cultures believed that the material from which the Universe came was eternal. However, today "the indestructibility or permanence of matter" is a scientific fact" wrote a 19th Century proponent of materialism. For many years that is how things stood. Any thought of a Creator and the earth having a beginning was just bare religious faith standing in lonely opposition to established science. Now in the 20th Century several sources of new evidence appeared : the implications from general relativity theory that the Universe is expanding; that some stars exhibit "red shift", implying that they are moving out...

No.10. The Birth of the Universe (cont.)

Notes from CREATION Magazine. Big Bang Universe by Jonathan Safati. The Currently leading Cosmogony (Gk. "birth of the universe") is the big bang theory.  This basically says, ' Nothing exploded and became everything'. One part of this energy became matter as per the famous Einstein formula E=mc2. However, when this occurs, the standard laws of Particle Physics state that    an equal amount of matter and antimatter must be produced.    Yet our universe comprises overwhelmingly of matter, with only rare and fleetingly short-lived antimatter particles, produced for example in experimental high energy collisions.  These are of the same mass but opposite charge (if the particle is charged) and magnetic moment as the corresponding matter particle . They soon interact and are mutually annihilated - anti-electron with an electron, anti-proton with proton, anti-neutron with neutron etc. How did matter survive annihilation from an equal amount of anti-matter....

No.26. The Problem of a Good GOD and the Presence of EVIL (cont.)

Notes Taken from Colson and Pearcey pps 209 and 210  #2      Deny that suffering and evil even exist.   Some people try to solve the problem of evil and suffering on earth saying they are merely illusions created by their own minds. Christian Science Monitor                              At Christian Scientists' meeting,  This is the strategy adopted by Christian Science and by some Eastern religions. Hinduism say that the physical universe is all an Illusion (maya) and that suffering of the body is just a misconception of the MIND. If we just train ourselves to think correctly, we can overcome all suffering through realising it does not exist. [Maya]  According to many schools of Hinduism , the world is an illusion, a play of the supreme consciousness of God. It is a projection of things and forms that are temporarily phenomenal and sustain the illusion of onen...