Skip to main content

No13. When Scientists "CHEAT" - TRUE?

In real fact, the much-touted experiments about the origin of life tell us very little about where real, functional proteins came from. However this is very rarely mentioned when Scientists blare out their fake headlines saying they have succeeded to create the building blocks of life.

 If scientists wanted us to really believe them, they would want to duplicate what might have happened in the primordial soup billions of years ago. They would simply mix up some chemicals in a vat, expose them to some energy source and see what happens. yet they never just do this. Why not? They would never get any chemical compounds that way. They have to have controlled experiments???????
1. Chemicals in nature are never found in just their pure form. They can never predict what reaction will take place.
How do scientists avoid complicated competing reactions. They only use isolated pure ingredients. They use new pure ingredients at each step.
2. They rig their experiments by screening out destructive wavelengths of ultraviolet light. They only want a controlled environment.
3. They use traps  that remove their amino acids from the reaction as soon as they form to protect them from disintegrating. They trap the amino acids in water.The delicate new compounds must be protected.
Image result for Picture of Miller's Experiment
1958 Experiment   - Science.




NATURE DOES NOT COME EQUIPPED WITH HANDY TRAPS TO PROTECT THE DELICATE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE.

 All these so-called famous experiments are just artificial manipulation trying to coax these chemical down 'chemical pathways' which never happens in the natural conditions on earth.

So what does all this prove: "That Life can only be created by an intelligent agent directing, controlling and guiding the process."
The latest Experiments just prove what Biblical faith says, "that an Intelligent agent was the Creator of all life on this Planet.
How now shall we then Live? Charles Colson p. 71-73

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No 26. Salvation through Sex

National Women's Hall of Fame Mary Steichen Calderone Mary Calderone sees the problem with the world is the human nature is not evolving as quickly as technology; therefore we must remould human nature itself to the modern, every changing world. She says that a new change is breaking across the Horizon and the task of Educators is to prepare children to step into this new world. To do this they must pry children away from old views and values especially from Biblical and other traditional forms of sexual morality for "religious laws and rules about sex were made on the basis of ignorance.  " Family Book about Sexuality" Calderone and Johnston p. 171 Notes from Colson and Pearcey p.242 When we trace the history of ideas about sexuality, it becomes clear that the founders of sex education never did seek simply to transmit a collection of facts about how our bodies work. Rather, they were evangelists for the utopian worldview, a religion , in which a "sci...

No.25 The Problem of a Good God, and Existence of Evil

Notes from Colson and Peacey Pps 208- 211 If God is both All-Good and All-Powerful he will not allow evil and suffering to exist in His Creation. Yet, evil does exist. Therefore, either God is not all-good (that is why He tolerates evil), ar, he is not all-powerful (that is why He can't get rid of evil, even if He wanted to.) Men try to propose their solutions but they all fall short of the Biblical Solution. Here are the normal human solutions to these supposed contradictions: Solution #1 Deny that God exists at all. The atheist simply throws out the first proposition. If there is no God at all, then evil poses no problem. Or does it? If we follow this proposal to its logical conclusion, the problem of evil is transformed into something even worse: that nothing  is evil, and by extension, that nothing is good. If there is no God then, there is no good and no evil. They are only subjective feelings taught by our society or culture telling us what is approved and what is dis...

No.23. Einstein and the Clergymen

"A God who did not abolish suffering - worse, a God who abolished sin precisely by suffering - is a scandal to the modern mind. "  Peter Kreeft. C. Colson and N. Pearcey p.203 ranker.com He ate grasshoppers just to troll his friends The year was 1942, and the scene was the crowded front parlour  of Albert Einstein's home, where the famous physicist had arranged a tea party for three clergymen: a young orthodox rabbi named Dov Hertzen, a middle-aged Catholic Priest named Brian McNaughton and a liberal Protestant Theologian named Mark Hartman. Albert Einstein's Out of my Latter years and  The World as I see it. "Rabbi Hertzen here 'provoked' this little party," Einstein began, as soon as the men had sampled the tea and cookies. " He congratulated me on my open-mindedness when I dropped my belief in a static Universe. Not long ago, I observed Hubble's red-shifts for myself at Cal Tech." Einstein leaned back in his chair and ...