Skip to main content

No.12 Life in a test tube?

Francis Beacon said " A little science estranges man from God. A lot of science brings him back." Colson and Pearcey p. 69

The way scientists try to prove that life arose in primitive seas is to re-create the same conditions in the laboratory and see what happens.
The most famous experiment was in 1953. Stanley Miller of Chicago when he claimed to have accomplished the first step toward creating life in a test tube. What was produced? Amino acids.

 The truth is  that these differ in critical ways from those found in living things.
Amino acids come in two forms, what scientists call left-handed and right-handed.  But living things are highly selective: They use only the left-handed. But Miller and his colleagues got both kinds - an even fifty/fifty mix of both left-handed and right-handed. There is no natural process that produces only left-handed amino acids, the kind required for living things. The amino acids formed in a test tube are useless for life.

The next problem is to get the amino acids to link up and form proteins.In 1958 Sidney Fox at the University of Miami boiled amino acids in water and induced them to react with one another. The result was protein-like chains of amino acids. Immediately Fox became famous.
The problem was the proteins in life are much more selective. . They are comprised of amino acids hooked together in a very particular chemical bond called a peptide bond. In the test tube they do form chains but they hook up , never producing a genuine protein capable of functioning in a living cell.
 In addition, for a protein to be functional, the amino acids must linkup in a particular sequence, just like the sequence of letters in a sentence. If you scramble the letter all you get is nonsense. All you get in lab. experiments all we get are scrambled, random sequences. There is no natural force capable of selecting the right amino acids and lining them up in the right order.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No 26. Salvation through Sex

National Women's Hall of Fame Mary Steichen Calderone Mary Calderone sees the problem with the world is the human nature is not evolving as quickly as technology; therefore we must remould human nature itself to the modern, every changing world. She says that a new change is breaking across the Horizon and the task of Educators is to prepare children to step into this new world. To do this they must pry children away from old views and values especially from Biblical and other traditional forms of sexual morality for "religious laws and rules about sex were made on the basis of ignorance.  " Family Book about Sexuality" Calderone and Johnston p. 171 Notes from Colson and Pearcey p.242 When we trace the history of ideas about sexuality, it becomes clear that the founders of sex education never did seek simply to transmit a collection of facts about how our bodies work. Rather, they were evangelists for the utopian worldview, a religion , in which a "sci...

No.23. Einstein and the Clergymen

"A God who did not abolish suffering - worse, a God who abolished sin precisely by suffering - is a scandal to the modern mind. "  Peter Kreeft. C. Colson and N. Pearcey p.203 ranker.com He ate grasshoppers just to troll his friends The year was 1942, and the scene was the crowded front parlour  of Albert Einstein's home, where the famous physicist had arranged a tea party for three clergymen: a young orthodox rabbi named Dov Hertzen, a middle-aged Catholic Priest named Brian McNaughton and a liberal Protestant Theologian named Mark Hartman. Albert Einstein's Out of my Latter years and  The World as I see it. "Rabbi Hertzen here 'provoked' this little party," Einstein began, as soon as the men had sampled the tea and cookies. " He congratulated me on my open-mindedness when I dropped my belief in a static Universe. Not long ago, I observed Hubble's red-shifts for myself at Cal Tech." Einstein leaned back in his chair and ...

no.5 Christianity and Multiculturalism

As a consequence of Moral Relativism  , the naturalist treats all cultures as morally equivalent, each only reflecting its own history and experience. India is Hindu and Thailand is Buddhist etc. Contemporary tends like Postmodernism and multiculturalism are rooted firmly in naturalism, for if there is no transcendent source of truth or morality, then we find our identity only in our race, or tribe or gender or Ethnic Group. One outstanding African Leader said that the Western Press and Media are only enforcing African Tribalism. But Christians can never equate truth with the limited perspective of some small group. TRUTH is God's Perspective as revealed in Scripture.. Jesus said in John 14:6 " I am the Way, the Truth and the Life". Notice the definite article before each making each unique. THE Way, THE Truth, and THE life. Hence, while we appreciate the cultural diversity, we insist on the propriety of judging particular cultural practices as morally wrong or rig...